Agroline » Reviews » Farm equipment »

Reviews Farm equipment

Search results: 211 reviews

Filter

Add a review

4.4

Wheel tractor Fendt 912 Vario

2001 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

To all fans of foreign-made tractors, I can recommend my Fendt 912 Vario. I have been mercilessly operating this machine on construction sites for 4 years, both in summer and winter. There have been some minor breakdowns: I have already sought help from a mechanic for the hydraulics. The engine and gearbox are in good condition, even though the operating time is already at 10,000 motor hours.

4.8

Wheel tractor Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60

1998 Year

5.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Assembling appears to be from Italy, a good working machine without any complaints at all. I bought it used in good condition, the consumables are changed on time and it won't let you down.

4.2

Wheel tractor New Holland T7550

2006 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

3.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

I have been using the New Holland T7550 tractor for 3 years. Everything suits me: the machine is powerful and reliable, but for complete operation, I had to refuel it with Euro 5 fuel. I heard that these machines often break down due to low-quality fuel. This especially applies to pumps and injectors. As for the downsides, I can only highlight the expensive service. Mostly, we use original spare parts. Luckily, sometimes you can catch promotions on them.

4.4

Mini tractor New Holland Т4

2018 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Despite the fact that the tractor itself is not bad, I wouldn't say that it is significantly better than similar models. However, the main problem is that it costs as much as two new MTZ tractors, and the price for a new one is simply astronomical. In terms of my experience working with it, I am satisfied. The engine is powerful, it pulls the plow well and handles weeds effectively. I rented it for my garden on an agricultural enterprise. The controls are convenient, and everything is clear from the first try. The cab has a rigid frame, so the machine doesn't shake on bumps. However, personally, I would still choose something cheaper and more affordable.

4.2

Wheel tractor New Holland T8050

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

2.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

Since the founding of our agricultural enterprise, we have always worked with domestically produced tractors. However, last year, we had to expand our seeding area, so we made the decision to purchase a powerful tractor. We opted for the New Holland T8050 model. This tractor performs at the highest level, efficiently completing its tasks while demonstrating fuel efficiency. The only drawback I can point out is the expensive service. Once, when we had to replace the engine and transmission oils, we ended up paying a hefty sum.

4.8

Wheel tractor Fendt 1000 Vario

2009 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

This was my second tractor after the old Kirovets. Fendt and Kirovets - two big differences. The German tractor immediately surprised me with its spacious and comfortable cabin. Fully automated control was a delight. No fatigue after shifts!

4.2

Wheel tractor John Deere 4066r

2018 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

3.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

I bought a used tractor from abroad for my farm. Regarding this tractor, I have some complaints - it worked poorly with the plow, constantly getting stuck. One of its notable characteristics is a fairly rigid frame, which comes in handy when working on rough terrain.

4.0

Grain harvester Case IH AF8120

2009 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

In 2010-2012, I worked with the Case IH AF8120, a pure American machine. It is an amazing piece of equipment. Very reliable, comfortable, and at the same time, easy to maintain and repair. After that, I worked with a John Deere combine and currently with a Claas Tucano, but in my opinion, even the Case IH machines from those years are better than many new combines. If we compare them to drum models, they may not be particularly suitable for dirty fields, but they are not designed for silage harvesting. The combines themselves are quite convenient to repair, with well-thought-out mechanics, no unnecessary shafts, bends, etc., and there is good access to the components.